Evaluation of the role of biological properties in the soil quality of the Hanam sub-basin of Lorestan province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Soil Biology and Biotechnology Research Department, SWRI

2 Microbiology Department, Biology Research Center, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran.

3 Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

10.22092/sbj.2023.362579.253

Abstract

The application of soil quality (SQ) in sustainable land management is evolving. However, despite their considerable importance, the inclusion of biological properties in soil quality assessments is limited due to the challenges and high costs associated with measuring these attributes. This study was carried out on the contribution of biological properties to soil quality. In this research, 22 physical, chemical, and biological properties of 90 surface soil samples (0-30 cm) were analyzed to determine the soil quality index (SQI) in the Honam region of Lorestan. Analyzed properties included pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic carbon (OC), total neutralizing value, clay and silt content, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), basal microbial respiration (MR), the total fungal and bacterial populations, the populations of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas species, as well as the activities of urease, acid and alkaline phosphatase, the available potassium and phosphorus concentrations, the total nitrogen, and the content of manganese, iron, copper, and zinc. Principal component analysis (PCA) to select a minimum data set (MDS) revealed that eight principal components, each with eigenvalues greater than one, accounted for 89.83% of the total variance. Of the 22 soil properties 12 were selected for the MDS, with biological properties (5 properties) making a more significant contribution than the physical and chemical properties. The spatial distribution of the SQI underlines the significant influence of biological properties on soil quality. These results underline the importance of including biological properties in the assessment of soil quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Aasfar, A., Bargaz, A., Yaakoubi, K., Hilali, A., Bennis, I., Zeroual, Y., Meftah Kadmiri, I. 2021. Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Frontiers in microbiology, 12:
  2. Abas, A. 2021. A systematic review on biomonitoring using lichen as the biological indicator: A decade of practices, progress and challenges. Ecological Indicators, 121: 107197.
  3. Abraham, J.S., Sripoorna, S., Dagar, J., Jangra, S., Kumar, A., Yadav, K., Singh, S., Goyal, A., Maurya, S., Gambhir, G. 2019. Soil ciliates of the Indian Delhi Region: Their community characteristics with emphasis on their ecological implications as sensitive bio-indicators for soil quality. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 26: 1305-1313.
  4. Andrews, S.S., Carroll, C.R. 2001. Designing a Soil Quality Assessment Tool for Sustainable Agroecosystem Management. Ecological Applications, 11: 1573-1585.
  5. Andrews, S.S., Karlen, D.L., Cambardella, C.A., 2004. The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68: 1945–1962.
  6. Alef, K., Nannipieri, P. 1995. Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press.
  7. Alves de Castro Lopes, A., Gomes de Sousa, D.M., Chaer, G.M., Bueno dos Reis Junior, F., Goedert, W.J., de Carvalho Mendes, I. 2013. Interpretation of microbial soil indicators as a function of crop yield and organic carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal 77: 461-472.
  8. Anderson, T.-H. 2003. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to asses soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 98: 285-293.
  9. Anderson, T.-H., Domsch, K.H. 1989. Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil biology and biochemistry, 21: 471-479.
  10. Bandyopadhyay, S., Maiti, S.K. 2021. Application of statistical and machine learning approach for prediction of soil quality index formulated to evaluate trajectory of ecosystem recovery in coal mine degraded land. Ecological Engineering, 170: 106351.
  11. Bremner, J.M. 1996. Nitrogen‐ Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5: 1085-1121.
  12. Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Novak, J. M., Parkin, T. B., Karalan, D. L., Turco, R. F., Konopka, A. E. 1994. Field Scale Variability of Soil Properties in Central Iowa Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 1501-1511.
  13. Campbell, T.P., Ulrich, D.E., Toyoda, J., Thompson, J., Munsky, B., Albright, M.B., Bailey, V.L., Tfaily, M.M., Dunbar, J. 2022. Microbial Communities Influence Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon Concentration by Altering Metabolite Composition.
  14. Chandel, S., Hadda, M., Mahal, A. 2018. Soil quality assessment through minimum data set under different land uses of submontane Punjab. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 49: 658-674.
  15. Coleman, M.D., Friend, A.L., Kern, C.C. 2004. Carbon allocation and nitrogen acquisition in a developing Populus deltoides plantation. Tree Physiology, 24: 1347-1357.
  16. Das, S.K., Varma, A., 2010. Role of enzymes in maintaining soil health, Soil enzymology. Springer, pp. 25-42.
  17. Delgado, A., Gómez, J.A. 2016. The soil. Physical, chemical and biological properties, Principles of agronomy for sustainable agriculture. Springer, pp. 15-26.
  18. Ebrahimi, M., Sarikhani, M.R., Shiri, J. 2022. Application of artificial neural network and gene expression programming to estimate soil microbial metabolic quotient. Applied Soil Ecology 175, 104465.
  19. Elfiati, D., Susilowati, A., Rachmat, H.H. 2019. Microbes Population and Soil Respiration Under The Kemenyan (Styrax spp) Stand Rhizosphere. KnE Engineering, 75–84.
  20. Fathizad, H., Ardakani, M.A.H., Heung, B., Sodaiezadeh, H., Rahmani, A., Fathabadi, A., Scholten, T., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R. 2020. Spatio-temporal dynamic of soil quality in the central Iranian desert modeled with machine learning and digital soil assessment techniques. Ecological Indicators, 118, 106736.
  21. Gee, G., Bauder, J. 1986. Particle-size analysis. p. 383–411. A. Klute (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. Particle-size analysis. p. 383–411. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
  22. Geisseler, D., Horwath, W.R. 2009. Short-term dynamics of soil carbon, microbial biomass, and soil enzyme activities as compared to longer-term effects of tillage in irrigated row crops. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46: 65-72.
  23. Gil-Sotres, F., Trasar-Cepeda, C., Leirós, M., Seoane, S. 2005. Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil biology and biochemistry, 37: 877-887.
  24. Griffiths, R.I., Thomson, B.C., James, P., Bell, T., Bailey, M., Whiteley, A.S. 2011. The bacterial biogeography of British soils. Environmental microbiology, 13: 1642-1654.
  25. Griffiths, R.I., Thomson, B.C., Plassart, P., Gweon, H.S., Stone, D., Creamer, R.E., Lemanceau, P., Bailey, M.J. 2016. Mapping and validating predictions of soil bacterial biodiversity using European and national scale datasets. Applied Soil Ecology, 97: 61-68.
  26. Guo, L., Sun, Z., Ouyang, Z., Han, D., Li, F., 2017. A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River. Catena, 152: 135-143.
  27. Guo, L.B., Gifford, R.M. 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global change biology, 8: 345-360.
  28. Hanson, P.J., Walker, A.P. 2020. Advancing global change biology through experimental manipulations: Where have we been and where might we go? Global change biology, 26: 287-299.
  29. Hartman, W.H., Richardson, C.J. 2013. Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes? PloS one 8, e57127.
  30. Hayat, W., Khan, S., Hayat, M.T., Pervez, R., Ahmad, S., Iqbal, A. 2021. The effect of deforestation on soil quality in Lesser-Himalayan community forests of Abbottabad, Pakistan. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14: 1-14.
  31. Helmke, P., Spark, D. 1996. Potassium, P 551-574. Methods of Soil Analysis. SSSA, Inc. ASA, Inc. Madison, WI.
  32. Hessari, B., Oweis, T. 2021. Conjunctive use of green and blue water resources in agriculture: Methodology and application for supplemental irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage, 70: 1193-1208.
  33. Horwath, W., Paul, E. 1994. Microbial biomass. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Microbiological and Biochemical Properties, 5: 753-773.
  34. Jahn, R., Blume, H., Asio, V., Spaargaren, O., Schad, P. 2006. Guidelines for soil description. FAO.
  35. Jamieson, P.D., Porter, J.R. and Wilson, D.R. 1991. A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field crops research, 27(4): 337-350.
  36. Jia, X., Zhong, Y., Liu, J., Zhu, G., Shangguan, Z., Yan, W., 2020. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on soil microbial characteristics: From biomass to enzyme activities. Geoderma, 366, 114256.
  37. Kalia, A., Sharma, S.P., Kaur, S., Kaur, H. 2020. Bacterial inoculants: how can these microbes sustain soil health and crop productivity?, Soil health. Springer, pp. 337-372.
  38. Kutu, F.R., Mokase, T., Dada, O., Rhode, O. 2019. Assessing microbial population dynamics, enzyme activities and phosphorus availability indices during phospho-compost production. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 8: 87-97.
  39. Liang, X., Jin, Y., He, M., Liu, Y., Hua, G., Wang, S., Tian, G., 2017. Composition of phosphorus species and phosphatase activities in a paddy soil treated with manure at varying rates. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 237: 173-180.
  40. Lindsay, W.L. 1979. Chemical equilibria in soils. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  41. Lindsay, W.L., Norvell, W. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil science society of America journal, 42: 421-428.
  42. Liu, S., Wang, J., Pu, S., Blagodatskaya, E., Kuzyakov, Y., Razavi, B.S. 2020. Impact of manure on soil biochemical properties: A global synthesis. Science of the Total Environment, 745, 141003.
  43. Margalef, O., Sardans, J., Fernández-Martínez, M., Molowny-Horas, R., Janssens, I., Ciais, P., Goll, D., Richter, A., Obersteiner, M., Asensio, D. 2017. Global patterns of phosphatase activity in natural soils. Scientific Reports, 7: 1-13.
  44. Masto, R., Chhonkar, P., Purakayastha, T., Patra, A., Singh, D. 2008. Soil quality indices for evaluation of long‐term land use and soil management practices in semi‐arid sub‐tropical India. Land degradation & development, 19: 516-529.
  45. Maurya, S., Abraham, J.S., Somasundaram, S., Toteja, R., Gupta, R., Makhija, S. 2020. Indicators for assessment of soil quality: a mini-review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192: 1-22.
  46. Meena, A., Rao, K. 2021. Assessment of soil microbial and enzyme activity in the rhizosphere zone under different land use/cover of a semiarid region, India. Ecological Processes, 10: 1-12.
  47. Milani, P.M., Eftekhari, K., Fatehi, S., Sepahvand, M., Turkelboom, F., De Pauw, E., Bruggeman, A. 2010. Semi-detailed soil surveys of Merek and Honam watersheds, Karkheh river basin, Iran. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria. vi.
  48. Moran-Rodas, V.E., Chavannavar, S.V., Joergensen, R.G., Wachendorf, C. 2022. Microbial response of distinct soil types to land-use intensification at a South-Indian rural-urban interface. Plant and Soil, 473: 389-405.
  49. Nabiollahi, K., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Kerry, R., Moradian, S. 2017. Assessment of soil quality indices for salt-affected agricultural land in Kurdistan Province, Iran. Ecological indicators, 83: 482-494.
  50. Negiş, H., Şeker, C. 2020. Estimation of soil quality of under long term sugar beet-wheat cropping system by factor analysis. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51: 440-455.
  51. Nehrani, S.H., Askari, M.S., Saadat, S., Delavar, M.A., Taheri, M., Holden, N.M. 2020. Quantification of soil quality under semi-arid agriculture in the northwest of Iran. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105770.
  52. Niemeyer, J.C., Lolata, G.B., de Carvalho, G.M., Da Silva, E.M., Sousa, J.P., Nogueira, M.A. 2012. Microbial indicators of soil health as tools for ecological risk assessment of a metal contaminated site in Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology, 59: 96-105.
  53. Norfleet, M., Ditzler, C., Puckett, W., Grossman, R., Shaw, J. 2003. Soil quality and its relationship to pedology. Soil Science, 168: 149-155.
  54. O’Brien, F.J., Almaraz, M., Foster, M.A., Hill, A.F., Huber, D.P., King, E.K., Langford, H., Lowe, M.-A., Mickan, B.S., Miller, V.S. 2019. Soil salinity and pH drive soil bacterial community composition and diversity along a lateritic slope in the Avon River critical zone observatory, Western Australia. Frontiers in microbiology, 10, 1486.
  55. Oldfield, E.E., Wood, S.A., Bradford, M.A. 2018. Direct effects of soil organic matter on productivity mirror those observed with organic amendments. Plant and Soil, 423: 363-373.
  56. Olsen, S.R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture.
  57. Peltzer, D.A., Wardle, D.A., Allison, V.J., Baisden, W.T., Bardgett, R.D., Chadwick, O.A., Condron, L.M., Parfitt, R.L., Porder, S., Richardson, S.J. 2010. Understanding ecosystem retrogression. Ecological Monographs, 80: 509-529.
  58. Pouladi, N., Jafarzadeh, A.A., Shahbazi, F., Ghorbani, M.A., Greve, M.H. 2020. Assessing the soil quality index as affected by two land use scenarios in Miandoab region. SN Applied Sciences, 2: 1-11.
  59. Pourhemmat, J. 2012. Water resources of the Karkheh River basin: hydrology, runoff, and water balance. Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).
  60. Qi, Y., Darilek, J.L., Huang, B., Zhao, Y., Sun, W., Gu, Z. 2009. Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma, 149: 325-334.
  61. Rabot, E., Wiesmeier, M., Schlüter, S., Vogel, H.-J. 2018. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma, 314: 122-137.
  62. Raiesi, F. 2017. A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions. Ecological indicators, 75: 307-320.
  63. Raiesi, F., Salek‐Gilani, S. 2020. Development of a soil quality index for characterizing effects of land‐use changes on degradation and ecological restoration of rangeland soils in a semi‐arid ecosystem. Land Degradation & Development. 31, 1533-1544.
  64. Rezaei, S.A., Gilkes, R.J., Andrews, S.S. 2006. A minimum data set for assessing soil quality in rangelands. Geoderma, 136: 229-234.
  65. Rhoades, J. 1983. Soluble salts. Methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 9: 167-179.
  66. Rinot, O., Levy, G.J., Steinberger, Y., Svoray, T., Eshel, G. 2019. Soil health assessment: A critical review of current methodologies and a proposed new approach. Science of the Total Environment, 648: 1484-1491.
  67. Rousk, J., Bååth, E., Brookes, P.C., Lauber, C.L., Lozupone, C., Caporaso, J.G., Knight, R., Fierer, N. 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. The ISME journal, 4: 1340-1351.
  68. Rowell, D.L. 2014. Soil science: Methods & applications. Routledge.
  69. Roy, D., Datta, A., Jat, H., Choudhary, M., Sharma, P., Singh, P., Jat, M. 2022. Impact of long term conservation agriculture on soil quality under cereal based systems of North West India. Geoderma, 405, 115391.
  70. Sage, R.F. 2020. Global change biology: A primer. Global Change Biology, 26: 3-30.
  71. Schinner, F., Öhlinger, R., Kandeler, E., Margesin, R. 2012. Methods in soil biology. Springer Science & business media.
  72. Scrimgeour, C. 2008. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis . Edited by MR Carter and EG Gregorich. Boca Raton, Fl, USA: CRC Press (2008), pp. 1224,£ 85.00. ISBN-13: 978-0-8593-3586-0. Experimental agriculture, 44: 437-437.
  73. Seaton, F.M., George, P.B., Lebron, I., Jones, D.L., Creer, S., Robinson, D.A. 2020. Soil textural heterogeneity impacts bacterial but not fungal diversity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 144, 107766.
  74. Shao, G., Ai, J., Sun, Q., Hou, L., Dong, Y. 2020. Soil quality assessment under different forest types in the Mount Tai, central Eastern China. Ecological indicators, 115, 106439.
  75. Singh, H.B., Vaishnav, A. 2021. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier.
  76. Siwik-Ziomek, A., Brzezinska, M., Lemanowicz, J., Koper, J., Szarlip, P. 2018. Biological parameters in technogenic soils of a former sulphur mine. International Agrophysics, 32 (2): 237-245.
  77. Sparling, G.P. 1992. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Soil Research, 30: 195-207.
  78. Spohn, M., Carminati, A., Kuzyakov, Y. 2013. Soil zymography–a novel in situ method for mapping distribution of enzyme activity in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 58: 275-280.
  79. Staff, S. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th Edn Washington. DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
  80. Stone, D., Ritz, K., Griffiths, B., Orgiazzi, A., Creamer, R. 2016. Selection of biological indicators appropriate for European soil monitoring. Applied Soil Ecology, 97: 12-22.
  81. Tavakoli, A.R., Oweis, T., Ashrafi, S., Asadi, H., Siadat, H., Liaghat, A. 2010. Improving rainwater productivity with supplemental irrigation in upper Karkheh river basin of Iran. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria.
  82. Terrat, S., Horrigue, W., Dequietd, S., Saby, N.P., Lelièvre, M., Nowak, V., Tripied, J., Régnier, T., Jolivet, C., Arrouays, D. 2017. Mapping and predictive variations of soil bacterial richness across France. PloS one 12, e0186766.
  83. Tian, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Z. 2022. Evaluation of Soil Quality for Different Types of Land Use Based on Minimum Dataset in the Typical Desert Steppe in Ningxia, China. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2022.
  84. Trasar-Cepeda, M.C., Gil-Sotres, F. 1987. Phosphatase activity in acid high organic matter soils in Galicia (NW Spain). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 19: 281-287.
  85. Umer, M.I., Rajab, S.M., Ismail, H.K. 2020. Effect of CaCO3 form on soil inherent quality properties of calcareous soils, Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publ, pp. 459-467.
  86. Usharani, K., Roopashree, K., Naik, D. 2019. Role of soil physical, chemical and biological properties for soil health improvement and sustainable agriculture. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8: 1256-1267.
  87. Vasu, D., Singh, S.K., Ray, S.K., Duraisami, V.P., Tiwary, P., Chandran, P., Nimkar, A.M., Anantwar, S.G. 2016. Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan plateau, India. Geoderma, 282: 70-79.
  88. Wang, M., Markert, B., Shen, W., Chen, W., Peng, C., Ouyang, Z. 2011. Microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities of urban soils in Beijing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 18: 958-967.
  89. Wardle, D. 1992. A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biological reviews, 67: 321-358.
  90. Waswa, B.S., Vlek, P.L., Tamene, L.D., Okoth, P., Mbakaya, D., Zingore, S. 2013. Evaluating indicators of land degradation in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Geoderma, 195: 192-200.
  91. Wilding, L.P., Drees, L.R. 1983. Spatial variability and pedology. Concepts and interactions, 83-116.
  92. Yao, R., Yang, J., Gao, P., Zhang, J., Jin, W. 2013. Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area. Soil and Tillage Research, 128: 137-148.
  93. Yu, P., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Li, Q., Zhou, D. 2018. Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China. Science of the Total Environment, 616: 564-571.
  94. Zhao, Q., Tang, J., Li, Z., Yang, W., Duan, Y. 2018. The influence of soil physico-Chemical properties and enzyme activities on soil quality of saline-alkali agroecosystems in western Jilin Province, China. Sustainability, 10, 1529.
  95. Evaluation of the role of biological properties in the soil quality of Hanam sub-basin of Lorestan province

 


  1.  
Journal of Sol Biology
Volume 11, Issue 2
March 2024
Pages 115-137

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics