Effects of Long-term Oil Pollution on Soil Microbial Respiration and β-glucosidase Activity

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student in soil biology and biotechnology, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University

2 Associate Professor of Soil Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University

3 Associate Professor of Soil Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University of Kermanshah

4 Professor of Soil Fertility, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University

5 Behnajadi and Plant Biotechnology Associate Professor, Behnajadi and Plant Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University

6 Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology, Department of Plant Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University of Kermanshah

10.22092/sbj.2024.362697.254

Abstract

Oil pollution is one of the most critical environmental contaminations that can affect soil's biological, physical, and chemical properties. To investigate the effects of long-term and natural oil pollution on soil microbial respiration, including basal respiration (BR) and substrate-induced respiration (SIR), and beta-glucosidase enzyme activity, 120 oil-contaminated soil samples were collected from 0-15 cm depth in the oil-rich region of Naft-Shahr in Kermanshah province with three pollution levels: high (H), moderate (M), and low (L). After measuring the physical and chemical properties of the soils, the total bacteria and oil-degrading bacteria were counted on NA and CFMM culture media, respectively. This finding showed a positive and significant correlation between microbial population and oil concentration. The average oil percentage measured by Soxhlet extraction was 4.03%, 9.95%, and 22.50% for L, M, and H levels, respectively. The results showed that with the increase in oil concentration in soil samples, BR and SIR increased, and the highest BR and SIR respiration rates were 0.053 and 0.234 (mgCO2.g-1.h-1) in H soils, respectively. The measured beta-glucosidase activity was also higher in the presence of oil pollutants, with the highest activity (24.78 µgPNP.g-1.h-1) in H soils and the lowest (6.09 µgPNP.g-1.h-1) in L soils. Finally, a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted, and the results showed that 72% of the variance among samples could be explained by the first two components (biochemical and physical components). Oil pollutants that are naturally present in the soil for an extended period lead to the adaptation of pollution-resistant microbial communities over time, increasing their abundance, microbial respiration, and the activity of enzymes such as beta-glucosidase.

Keywords


  1. Abed, R.M., and S, Al-Kindi. 2017. Effect of disturbance by oil pollution on the diversity and activity of bacterial communities in biological soil crusts from the Sultanate of Oman. Applied Soil Ecology. 110: 88-96.
  2. Anderson, J.P., and KH, Domsch. 1973. Quantification of bacterial and fungal contributions to soil respiration. Archives of Microbiology. 93: 113-127.
  3. Brohon, B., C, Delolme,, and R, Gourdon. 2001. Complementarity of bioassays and microbial activity measurements for the evaluation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils quality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 33(7-8): 883-891.
  4. Christopher, S., P, Hein., J, Marsden., and A.S, Shurleff. 1988. Evaluation of methods 3540 (soxhlet) and 3550 (Sonication) for evaluation of appendix IX analyses from solid samples. S-CUBED, Report for EPA contract 68-03-33-75, work assignment No. 03, Document No (pp. 523-546). SSS.
  5. Cox, J.F., JH, Blackstone and JG Schleier. 2003. Managing Operations: A Focuse on Excellence. North River Press, Great Barrington, MA.
  6. Dawson, J.J.C., E.J., Godsiffe., I.P., Thompson., T.K., Ralebitso-Senior., K.S., Killham., and G.I., Paton. 2007. Application of biological indicators to assess recovery of hydrocarbon impacted soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 39(1): 164-177.
  7. Doran, J.W., and M.R., Zeiss. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol.15;3–11.
  8. Dos Santos, H. F., J.C., Cury., F.L., Do Carmo., A.L., Dos Santos., J., Tiedje., J.D., van Elsas., ... and R.S., Peixoto. 2011. Mangrove bacterial diversity and the impact of oil contamination revealed by pyrosequencing: bacterial proxies for oil pollution. PloS one. 6(3): e16943.
  9. Hui, L. I., Y., Zhang., I., Kravchenko., X.U., Hui., and C.G., Zhang. 2007. Dynamic changes in microbial activity and community structure during biodegradation of petroleum compounds: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 19(8): 1003-1013.
  10. Kroening, S.J., and L.G., Greenfield. 2002. Effects of diesel oil contamination on soil microorganisms.
  11. Labud, V., C., Garcia., and T., Hernandez. 2007. Effect of hydrocarbon pollution on the microbial properties of a sandy and a clay soil. Chemosphere. 66(10): 1863-1871.
  12. Lee, S.H., B., Oh., and J.G., Kim. 2008. Effect of various amendments on heavy mineral oil bioremediation and soil microbial activity. Bioresource technology. 99(7): 2578-2587.
  13. Liang, Y., X., Zhang., J., Zhou., and G., Li. 2015. Long‐term oil contamination increases deterministic assembly processes in soil microbes. Ecological Applications. 25(5): 1235-1243.
  14. Liao, J., J., Wang., D., Jiang., M.C., Wang., and Y., Huang. 2015. Long-term oil contamination causes similar changes in microbial communities of two distinct soils. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 99: 10299-10310.
  15. Margesin, R., M., Hämmerle., and D., Tscherko. 2007. Microbial activity and community composition during bioremediation of diesel-oil-contaminated soil: effects of hydrocarbon concentration, fertilizers, and incubation time. Microbial ecology. 53: 259-269.
  16. Martin, A. E., and R., Reeve. 1955. A rapid manometeic method for determining soil carbonate. Soil Science. 79(3): 187-198.
  17. Moreno, B., R., Nogales., C., Macci., G., Masciandaro., and E., Benitez. 2011. Microbial eco-physiological profiles to estimate the biological restoration of a trichloroethylene-contaminated soil. Ecological Indicators. 11(6),: 1563-1571.
  18. Nie, M., X.D., Zhang., J.Q., Wang., L.F., Jiang., J., Yang., Z.X., Quan., ... and B., Li. 2009. Rhizosphere effects on soil bacterial abundance and diversity in the Yellow River Deltaic ecosystem as influenced by petroleum contamination and soil salinization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 41(12): 2535-2542.
  19. Pessacq, J., R., Medina., C., Terada., F.E., Bianchini., I.S., Morelli., M.T., Del Panno. 2015. Assessment of the responsiveness to different stresses of the microbial community from long-term hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. WAT. AIR AND SOIL POLL. 226(2): 1-13.
  20. Riffaldi, R., R., Levi-Minzi., R., Cardelli., S., Palumbo., A., Saviozzi. 2006. Soil biological activities in monitoring the bioremediation of diesel oil-contaminated soil. Water, air, and soil pollution. 170: 3-15.
  21. Rowell, D.L. (1994). Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Longman, UK.
  22. Schinner, F., R., Öhlinger., E., Kandeler., and R., Margesin. (Eds.). 2012. Methods in soil biology. Springer Science & Business Media.
  23. Sutton, N.B., F., Maphosa., J.A., Morillo., W., Abu Al-Soud., A.A., Langenhoff., T., Grotenhuis., H.H., Rijnaarts., H., Smidt. 2013. Impact of long-term diesel contamination on soil microbial community structure. Appl Environ Microbiol. 79(2):619–630.
  24. Turner, B. L., D.W., Hopkins., P.M., Haygarth., N., Ostle. 2002. β-Glucosidase activity in pasture soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 20(2): 157-162.
  25. Vincent, A.O., E., Felix., M.O., Weltime., O.K., Ize-iyamu., E.E., Daniel. 2011. Microbial degradation and its kinetics on crude oil polluted soil. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences.