The effect of Bradyrhizobium inoculation on nitrogen fixation, yield, and its components in soybean cultivars (Glycine max L.) under waterlogging stress

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Agriculture, Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

10.22092/sbj.2026.373894.299

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Soybean (Glycine max L.) is widely recognized as one of the most important crops within the legume family, and it is undeniably one of the main sources of protein and vegetable oil in the world, and plays an exceptionally important role in human nutrition, animal feed, and the food industry. Despite the immense economic and nutritional importance of this plant, the occurrence of environmental stresses, especially flooding or waterlogging, can significantly reduce its overall growth and performance. Flooding disrupts root activity as well as water and nutrient absorption by severely reducing the available oxygen levels in the root zone, and consequently, it negatively affects the overall nutritional status of the plant by reducing root nodule activity and disrupting the vital process of biological nitrogen fixation. Therefore, the strategic use of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, especially Rhizobium species, can be considered as one of the most effective biological solutions to reduce the adverse effects of this particular stress. Given the inherent genetic differences between soybean cultivars in their natural tolerance to flooding and their specific response to bacterial inoculation, identifying highly tolerant and efficient cultivars in terms of symbiosis with Rhizobium is of particular importance. Accordingly, this study was specifically conducted to evaluate the effect of waterlogging stress and Rhizobium inoculation on yield, yield components, and biological nitrogen fixation in selected soybean cultivars.
 
Materials and Methods: This research was conducted during the course of the 2022-2023 crop year as a controlled pot experiment at the Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. The experiment was carried out as a factorial arrangement structured within a completely randomized design with three replications. The experimental treatments included four distinct soybean cultivars, specifically including Sari, Saman, Ketul, and Amir; two levels of bacterial inoculation, specifically including active inoculation and no inoculation; and two levels of waterlogging stress, specifically including no flooding and flooding for a consecutive period of 15 days. The seeds designated for the inoculation treatment were inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteria before the sowing process. Waterlogging stress was applied at the beginning of the flowering stage (referred to as the R1 developmental stage). At the end of the applied stress period, physiological traits including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids; traits related to nitrogen nutrition status and biological nitrogen fixation including leaf nitrogen content, as well as the number and diameter of root nodules; as well as yield components including the total number and weight of pods, the number of seeds per pod, and the final grain yield were meticulously measured and compared. After collecting the experimental data, they were statistically analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure and comparing the means of the treatments.
 
Results: The analytical results showed that waterlogging stress and bacterial inoculation, as well as their mutual interaction with the cultivar, had significantly different effects on the measured physiological traits, nitrogen fixation, and the ultimate soybean yield. Under normal, non-stress conditions, Rhizobium inoculation increased the overall content of chlorophyll a and b in the majority of the evaluated cultivars; so that the highest proportional increase in chlorophyll a was observed in the Sari cultivar, and the highest increase in chlorophyll b was observed in the Saman cultivar. Also, bacterial inoculation successfully increased the content of carotenoids in all of the tested cultivars. Waterlogging stress substantially reduced photosynthetic pigments and leaf nitrogen, but the severity of this decrease was notably different across the different cultivars. Bacterial inoculation under waterlogging conditions was able to compensate for a significant part of the reduction in photosynthetic pigments. In terms of traits related to nitrogen fixation, Rhizobium inoculation increased the number of root nodules per plant under non-stress conditions in the Ketul and Amir cultivars from 12 to 28 and from 18 to 31 nodules, respectively. Under waterlogging conditions, the evaluated cultivars Ketul and Amir showed a more favorable response to the bacterial inoculation by successfully maintaining a higher number of functional root nodules. The detailed study of yield components also showed that the effect of inoculation on the number of pods was different in the different cultivars, and the response of the cultivars to waterlogging conditions was not the same across the board. Under non-stress conditions, bacterial inoculation increased the grain yield of the cultivar Sari from 28.6 to 68.4 g/plant; while a decrease in yield was observed in the cultivar Ketul. Also, under waterlogging conditions, bacterial inoculation increased the grain yield from 29.5 to 55.4 g/plant, indicating a clear and partial reduction in the overall stress-induced damage.
 
Conclusion: In general, waterlogging stress negatively affected the overall soybean yield by disrupting the essential photosynthetic activity, leaf nitrogen status, and the total number of active root nodules; however, the intensity of the physiological stress response and the degree of benefit derived from the bacterial inoculation varied among the tested cultivars. Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation helped to successfully maintain the optimum nitrogen nutrition status and effectively reduce the negative effects of waterlogging stress by improving some key physiological traits and increasing the overall capacity for nodulation. Among the cultivars that were studied, the Sari cultivar showed better performance in terms of maintaining photosynthetic pigments and sustaining final grain yield, and the Ketul and Amir cultivars showed better performance in terms of nodulation efficiency and positive response to the applied bacterial inoculation. Therefore, selecting an appropriate cultivar along with using Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation can be highly recommended as an effective and practical strategy to increase soybean tolerance to waterlogging stress and to significantly improve production sustainability under environmental conditions that are susceptible to this type of stress.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ali-Ehyaei, M. 2007. Description of Chemical Soil Analysis Methods (Volume 2). Publication No. 1024, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research and Education Institute, Tehran, Iran.(in persian)
  2. Ardakani, M. and Nadur, A. 2009. Principles and Techniques for Plant Scientists. Tehran University Press. 270p. (in persian)
  3. Arnon D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 24 (1): 1-15. https://doi.org/1104/pp.24.1.1
  4. Chen, W., Yao, Q., Patil, G.B., Agarwal, G., Deshmukh, R.K., Lin, L., Wang, B., Wang, Y., Prince, S.J., Song, L., Xu, D., An, Y.C., Valliyodan, B., Varshney, R.K. and Nguyen, H.T. 2016. Identification and comparative analysis of differential gene expression in soybean leaf tissue under drought and flooding stress revealed by RNA-Seq. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01044
  5. Chieb, M. and Gachomo, E.W. 2023. The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses. BMC plant biology, 23(1), 407. Doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8
  6. Daneshian, j. 2020. Collection of publications on world experiences in the agricultural and natural resources sector; Comparison of soybean development in Iran with other countries (No. 4). Agricultural Education Publication. 60 pages. (in persian)
  7. Garcia, N., da-Silva, C.J., Cocco, K.L.T., Pomagualli, D., de Oliveira, F.K., da Silva, J.V.L., de Oliveira, A.C.B. and do Amarante, L. 2020. Waterlogging tolerance of five soybean genotypes through different physiological and biochemical mechanisms. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 172: 103975. Doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.103975
  8. Ghazan Shahi, J. 1997. Soil and Plant Analysis; Aizh Publications: Tehran, Iran. p 272. (In Persian)
  9. Herzog, M., Striker, G.G., Colmer, T.D. and Pedersen, O. 2016. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat–a review of root and shoot physiology. Plant, cell & environment, 39(5), 1068-1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12676
  10. Khadempir, M. 2013. Effect of flooding period on reproductive stage on some anatomical physiological characteristics and soybean yield. Master's Degree in Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 125 p. (In persian)(Dissertation)
  11. Khan, M.N., Ahmed, I., Ud Din, I., Noureldeen, A., Darwish, H. and Khan, M. 2022. Proteomic insight into soybean response to flooding stress reveals changes in energy metabolism and cell wall modifications. Plos one, 17(5), e0264453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264453
  12. Kim, Y.H., Hwang, S.J., Waqas, M., Khan, A.L., Lee, J.H., Lee, J.D., Nguyen, H.T. and Lee, I.J. 2015. Comparative analysis of endogenous hormones level in two soybean (Glycine max) lines differing in waterlogging tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 6:714. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00714
  13. Krisnawati, A., Nuryati, & Adie, M.M. 2021. Agronomic tolerance changes of soybean genotypes under waterlogged condition. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science(Vol. 648, No. 1, p. 012046). IOP Publishing.‏ DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/648/1/012046
  14. Ladha, J.K., Peoples, M.B., Reddy, P.M., Biswas, J.C., Bennett, A., Jat, M.L., Krupnik, T.J. 2022. Biological nitrogen fixation and prospects for ecological intensification in cereal-based cropping systems. Field Crops Res. 283, 108541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108541.
  15. Liu, K., Harrison, M.T., Ibrahim, A., Manik, S.N., Johnson, P., Tian, X., Meinke, H. and Zhou, M. 2020. Genetic factors increasing barley grain yields under soil waterlogging. Food Energy Secur. 9, e238. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.238
  16. Maluk, M., Giles, M., Wardell, G.E., Akramin, A.T., Ferrando-Molina, F., Murdoch, A., Barros, M., Beukes, C., Vasconçelos, M., Harrison, E., Daniell, T.J., Quilliam, R.S., Iannetta, P.P.M. and James, E.K. 2023. Biological nitrogen fixation by soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.), a novel, high protein crop in Scotland, requires inoculation with non-native bradyrhizobia. Agron. 5:1196873. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2023.1196873
  17. Mutava, R.N., Prince, S.J.K., Syed, N.H., Song, L., Valliyodan, B., Chen, W. and Nguyen, H.T. 2015. Understanding abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms in soybean: A comparative evaluation of soybean response to drought and flooding stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 86, 109-120. Doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.11.010.
  18. Pandit, M., Panthi, S. and Chiluwal, A. 2026. Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Soybean: Mechanisms, Benefits, Sustainability, and Future Prospects. Agronomy, 16(10), 946.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16100946
  19. Pirdehghan, S., Rahemi-Karizaki, A., Gholamali Pouralemdari, A., Sabouri, H. 2019. Germination and growth of wheat seedlings in response to waterlogging stress. Journal of applied research of plant ecophysiology. 7 (14):1-24. (in persian).
  20. Pirvali Beiranvand, N., Afrideh, H., Saqeb, N.A. and Saleh Rastin, N. 2003. Study of the ability of some strains of Rhizobium japonicum to provide nitrogen to soybean cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 34(1), 97-104. (in persian).
  21. Pucciariello, C., Boscari, A., Tagliani, A., Brouquisse, R. and Perata, P. 2019. Exploring legume-rhizobia symbiotic models for waterlogging tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00578
  22. Qi, X., Li, Q., Ma, X., Qian, C., Wang, H., Ren, N., Shen, Ch., Huang, SH., Xu, W., Xu, Q. and Chen, X. 2019. Waterlogging‐induced adventitious root formation in cucumber is regulated by ethylene and auxin through reactive oxygen species signalling. Plant, Cell & Environment, 42(5), 1458-1470. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13504
  23. Qin, P., Wang, T. and Luo, Y. 2022. A review on plant-based proteins from soybean: Health benefits and soy product development. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 7, 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100265
  24. Rasouli, F., Galashi, S., Pirdashti, H. and Zeinali, E. 2014. Investigation of waterlogging stress effect on yield and yield components of rapeseed (Brassica napus). Journal of Crop Production, 7(2), 23-42. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2008739.1393.7.2.2.7 (in persian)
  25. Razmi, N. 2022. Soybean Production. Agricultural Education and Extension, Agricultural Education Publication. 72 pages. (in persian)
  26. Seyed Sharifi, R. 2013. The effect of seed inoculation with rhizobium and nitrogen fertilizer application on soybean yield and agronomic characteristics under Ardabil conditions. Iranian Agricultural Research. 11(4): 618-628. (in persian)
  27. Schuman, G.E., Stanley, M.A. and Knudsen, D. 1973. Automated total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant samples. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 37(3): 480–481. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700030045x.
  28. Tewari, S. and Arora, N.K. 2016. Soybean production under flooding stress and its mitigation using plant growth-promoting microbes. In Environmental stresses in soybean production (pp. 23-40). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801535-3.00002-4
  29. Turani, M. 2013. Studying the effect of flooding period in the vegetative growth stage on some physiological and anatomical characteristics and yield of soybean. Master's thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 117 pp. (in persian)
  30. Wu, C., Zeng, A., Chen, P., Florez‐Palacios, L., Hummer, W., Mokua, J., Klepadlo, M., Yan, L., MA, Q. and Cheng, Y. 2017. An effective field screening method for flood tolerance in soybean. Plant Breeding, 136(5), 710-719.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12487
  31. Wybouw, B. and De Rybel, B. 2019. Cytokinin–a developing story. Trends in plant science, 24(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/S1360-1385(18)30245-0
  32. Xuewen, X., Huihui, W., Xiaohua, Q., Qiang, X. and Xuehao, C. 2014. Waterlogging-induced increase in fermentation and related gene expression in the root of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 179, 388-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.001
  33. Zhang, P., Lyu, D., Jia, L., He, J. and Qin, S. 2017. Physiological and de novo transcriptome analysis of the fermentation mechanism of Cerasus sachalinensis roots in response to short-term waterlogging. BMC genomics, 18, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4055-1

Zimmer, S., Messmer, M., Haasec, Th., Piepho, H.P., Mindermann, A., Schulz, H., Habekub, A., Ordon, F., Wilbois, K.P. and Heb, J. 2016. Effects of soybean variety and Bradyrhizobium strains on yield, protein content and biological nitrogen fixation under cool growing conditions in Germany. Europ. J. Agron., 72: 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.008