Study of Serndipita indica and Sinorhizobium meliloti on concentration and kinetics of zinc release in alfalfa rhizosphere contaminated with zinc oxide nanoparticles

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Shiraz, Iran

2 Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education CenterAREEO, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The application of nano-fertilizers, such as zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs), is an emerging strategy to improve micronutrient efficiency in sustainable agriculture. However, the overuse of ZnO-NPs, particularly in calcareous soils with low zinc availability, risks soil contamination and subsequent toxicity to plants and soil biota. The bioavailability of zinc from these nanoparticles is governed by complex interactions within the rhizosphere, involving the soil matrix, plant roots, and plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs). While PGPMs like fungi and bacteria can alter metal bioavailability, their combined effects and the resulting release dynamics are not fully understood. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of inoculating the fungus Serendipita indica and the bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti, both individually and in combination, on the release kinetics of zinc in the rhizosphere of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) grown in soil contaminated with different levels of ZnO-NPs.




Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design with three replications on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cv. Hamedani in a greenhouse. The soil used was a loamy-clay collected from the 0-30 cm layer of Chitgaran station in Shiraz, Iran, with a pH of 8.3, 0.71% organic matter, and 42.5% calcium carbonate equivalent. The soil was autoclaved at 121°C for 25 minutes before use. Treatments included three levels (0, 400, and 800 mg kg⁻¹ soil) of ZnO-NPs (average diameter of 10 nm, sourced from Pishgaman Nano Mavadd-e Iran Co.) and four levels of microbial inoculation (a non-inoculated control, S. indica alone, S. meliloti alone, and co-inoculation of the fungus and bacterium). Soils were incubated for three months at field capacity to allow for equilibration reactions. The S. indica inoculum was prepared by collecting spores from a 4-week-old culture, with the final concentration adjusted to 5×10⁵ spores mL⁻¹. The S. meliloti strain, selected for its high N-fixation and PGP traits (including possession of nfe, putA, and acdS genes), was cultured for 48 hours, and the inoculum was adjusted to 5×10⁷ cells mL⁻¹. In order to find the best model to describe the zinc release pattern, time-dependent release data were fitted to nine kinetic equations (zero-, first-, second-, third-order, parabolic diffusion, power function, simplified Elovich, pseudo-first-order, and pseudo-second-order). For each experimental treatment, the best kinetic equation was selected based on the highest coefficient of determination (R²) and the lowest standard error (SE). Zinc concentrations were measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Shimadzu AA 670). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.1, and means were compared using the LSD test at P≤0.05.
Results: The results showed that co-inoculation of the fungus and bacterium at 400 and 800 mg Zn kg⁻¹ had the lowest rhizosphere pH value, resulting in a decrease of 15.25% and 6.81%, respectively, compared to the zero-Zn level. Also, at the 800 mg Zn kg⁻¹ level, inoculation with the fungus alone and co-inoculation with the bacterium were equally effective, showing the highest ability to release zinc from the rhizosphere soil; these treatments led to an increase of 27.79% and 26.42%, respectively, in the amount of cumulative zinc released compared to the uninoculated condition. The study of the zinc release pattern under the influence of different zinc levels and microbial inoculation showed that the process of zinc release in all treatments followed a two-stage kinetic process that starts with a fast release step and then reaches equilibrium after a slow step. In the initial rapid phase, zinc release corresponds to mobile forms with low bond energy, and in the second stage, to forms with less mobility. This was confirmed by the observation that approximately 68-76% of the total desorbed zinc was released within the first two hours of extraction. Analysis of the kinetic models showed that the pseudo-second-order (R² > 0.995) and power function (R² > 0.94) equations provided the best fit for the zinc release data in all experimental treatments, while the simplified Elovich equation was also suitable only at the control (zero Zn) level. The superiority of the pseudo-second-order model was further validated by the positive and significant correlation between its calculated equilibrium zinc concentration (qe) and the plant-available zinc concentrations (extracted by DTPA in 2 hours), as well as the zinc concentrations in the root and shoot tissues of the alfalfa plants.
 




Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that microbial inoculation, particularly co-inoculation with S. indica and S. meliloti, is an effective strategy for acidifying the rhizosphere and increasing the release of zinc from soil contaminated with ZnO-NPs. The highest efficacy was observed at high contamination levels, where fungal inoculation (alone or combined) enhanced cumulative zinc release by approximately 27%. The kinetics of zinc release in the calcareous soil followed a two-stage process, dominated by an initial rapid release of weakly bound zinc forms. Among the nine models tested, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model proved to be the most robust descriptor of the zinc release process across all treatments, which was confirmed by its strong correlation with plant-available zinc. These findings highlight the potential of using synergistic microbial partnerships to manipulate the bioavailability of nanoparticle-derived contaminants in the rhizosphere and underscore the importance of kinetic modeling in predicting nutrient and contaminant release patterns in complex soil systems.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Allison, L.E., and Moodie, C.D. (1965). Carbonate. In C. A. Black et al. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 (pp. 1379-1396). Monograph No. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
  2. Ansari, M., Malakouti, M. J., Rejali, F., Mokhtassi Bidgoli, A., & Golkari, S. (2025). Screening and identification of the most effective rhizobial isolate (Mezorhizobiumciceri) and investigating its interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in the yield and quality of chickpea seeds of Anna. Journal of Soil Biology, 12(2), 261-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/sbj.2025.367013.270
  3. Bandyopadhyay, S., Plascencia-Villa, G., Mukherjee, A., Rico, C. M., José-Yacamán, M., Peralta-Videa, J. R. and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2015). Comparative phytotoxicity of ZnO NPs, bulk ZnO, and ionic zinc onto the alfalfa plants symbiotically associated with Sinorhizobium meliloti in soil. Science of the Total Environment, 515-516, 60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.027
  4. Bouyoucos, C.J. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle-size analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54(5), 464-465. doi: 10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
  5. Chai, H., Yao, J., Sun, J., Zhang, C., Liu, W., Zhu, M. and Ceccanti, B. (2015). The effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on functional bacteria and metabolic profiles in agricultural soil. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 94(4), 490-495. doi: 10.1007/s00128-015-1518-2
  6. Chen, Y.H. and Li, F.A. (2010). Kinetic study on removal of copper (II) using goethite and hematite nano-photocatalysts. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 347(2), 277-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.003
  7. Chien, S.H. and Clayton, W.R. (1980). Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(2), 265-268. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020013x
  8. Dary, M., Chamber-Pérez, M.A., Palomares, A. J. and Pajuelo, E. (2010). “In situ” phytostabilisation of heavy metal polluted soils using Lupinus luteus inoculated with metal resistant plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177(1-3), 323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.037
  9. Dickson, S. and Smith, S.E. (1998). Evaluation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation by staining. In A. Varma (Ed.), Mycorrhiza Manual (pp. 77-83). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  10. Fagorzi, C., Checcucci, A., DiCenzo, G.C., Debiec-Andrzejewska, K., Dziewit, L., Pini, F., & Mengoni, A. (2018). Harnessing rhizobia to improve heavy-metal phytoremediation by legumes. Genes, 9(11), 542. doi: 10.3390/genes9110542
  11. Farzaneh, M., Wichmann, S., Vierheilig, H. and Kaul, H.P. (2009). The effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza and nitrogen nutrition on growth of chickpea and barley. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften (German Journal of Agronomy), 13, 15–22.
  12. Garcia-Gomez, C., Babin, M., Obrador, A., Alvarez, J.M. and Fernandez, M.D. (2015). Integrating ecotoxicity and chemical approaches to compare the effects of ZnO nanoparticles, ZnO bulk, and ZnCl2 on plants and microorganisms in a natural soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(21), 16803-16813. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4927-4
  13. Ghabooli, M., Khatabi, B., Ahmadi, F.S., Sepehri, M., Mirzaei, M., Amirkhani, A. and Salekdeh, G.H. (2013). Proteomics study reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying water stress tolerance induced by Piriformospora indica in barley. Journal of Proteomics, 94, 289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.09.027
  14. Ghasemi‐Fasaei, R., Maftoun, M., Olama, V., Molazem, B. and Tavajjoh, M. (2009). Manganese‐Release Characteristics of Highly Calcareous Soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40(7-8), 1171-1182. doi: 10.1080/00103620902724838
  15. Hao, X., Taghavi, S., Xie, P., Orbach, M.J., Alwathnani, H.A., Rensing, C. and Wei, G. (2014). Phytoremediation of heavy and transition metals aided by legume-rhizobia symbiosis. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 16(2), 179-202. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2013.793767
  16. He, X., Deng, H. and Hwang, H.M. (2019). The current application of nanotechnology in food and agriculture. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 27(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.12.002
  17. Hinsinger, P., Plassard, C., Tang, C. and Jaillard, B. (2003). Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant and Soil, 248(1), 43-59. doi: 10.1023/A:1022371130513
  18. Kandpal, G., Srivastava, P.C. and Ram, B. (2005). Kinetics of desorption of heavy metals from polluted soils: Influence of soil type and metal source. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 161(1), 353-363. doi: 10.1007/s11270-005-4309-8
  19. Khatabi, B., Molitor, A., Lindermayr, C., Pfiffi, S., Durner, J., Von Wettstein, D. and Schäfer, P. (2012). Ethylene supports colonization of plant roots by the mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica. PLoS One, 7(4), e35502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035502
  20. Khoshru, B., Fallah Nosratabad, A., Khosravi, H., Asgharzadeh, A., & Faridian, L. (2025). Enhancing agricultural productivity using PGPR and nanoparticles: mechanisms, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Soil Biology, 12(2), 279-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/sbj.2025.368425.277
  21. Kidd, P.S., Alvarez-Lopez, V., Becerra-Castro, C., Cabello-Conejo, M. and Prieto-Fernandez, A. (2017). Potential role of plant-associated bacteria in plant metal uptake and implications in phytotechnologies. Advances in Botanical Research, 83, 87-126. doi: 10.1016/bs.abr.2016.12.003
  22. Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42(3), 421-428. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  23. Martin, H.W. and Sparks, D.L. (1983). Kinetics of nonexchangeable potassium release from two coastal plain soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 47(5), 883-887. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700050013x
  24. Motaghian, H.R. and Hosseinpur, A.R. (2013). Zinc desorption kinetics in wheat (Triticum aestivum) rhizosphere in some sewage sludge amended soils. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 13(3), 664-678. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162013005000053
  25. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
  26. Peech, M. (1965). Hydrogen ion activity. In C.A. Black et al. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 (pp. 922-923). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
  27. Peralta-Videa, J.R., De la Rosa, G., Gonzalez, J.H. and Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. (2004). Effects of the growth stage on the heavy metal tolerance of alfalfa plants. Advances in Environmental Research, 8(3-4), 679-685. doi: 10.1016/S1093-0191(03)00067-2
  28. Pikuła, D. and Stępień, W. (2007). Effect of soil pH on the uptake of heavy metals by plants. Fragmenta Agronomica, 24(2), 227-237.
  29. Polettini, A., Pomi, R. and Rolle, E. (2007). The effect of operating variables on chelant-assisted remediation of contaminated dredged sediment. Chemosphere, 66(5), 866-877. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.053
  30. Reyhanitabar, A. and Gilkes, R.J. (2010). Kinetics of DTPA extraction of zinc from calcareous soils. Geoderma, 154(3-4), 289-293. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.10.013
  31. Reyhanitabar, A. and Karimian, N. (2008). Kinetics of copper desorption of selected calcareous soils from Iran. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 4(3), 287-293.
  32. Reyhanitabar, A., Ardalani, M., Gilkes, R.J. and Savaghebi, G. (2010). Zinc sorption characteristics of some selected calcareous soils of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 12(1), 99-110.
  33. Safari Sinegani, A. A., & Karami, L. (2025). The effect of the application of coal ash in soil on the symbiotic indices of white pea inoculated with Mesorhizobium and mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Soil Biology. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/sbj.2025.368447.278
  34. Saffari, M., Karimian, N., Ronaghi, A., Yasrebi, J. and Ghasemi-Fasaei, R. (2014). Reduction of chromium toxicity by applying various soil amendments in artificially contaminated soil. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research, 2(4), 251-262.
  35. Saleem, M., Meckes, N., Pervaiz, Z.H. and Traw, M.B. (2017). Microbial interactions in the phyllosphere increase plant performance under herbivore biotic stress. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 41. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00041
  36. Sandilya, S.P., Bhuyan, P.M., Nageshappa, V., Gogoi, D.K. and Kardong, D. (2017). Impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa MAJ PIA03 affecting the growth and phytonutrient production of castor, a primary host-plant of Samia ricini. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17(2), 499-514. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162017005000041
  37. Sasse, J., Martinoia, E. and Northen, T. (2018). Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends in Plant Science, 23(1), 25-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.008
  38. Sepehri, M. and Khatabi, B. (2021). Combination of Siderophore-Producing Bacteria and Piriformospora indica Provides an Efficient Approach to Improve Cadmium Tolerance in Alfalfa. Microbial Ecology, 81(3), 717-730. doi: 10.1007/s00248-020-01614-7
  39. Seshadri, B., Bolan, N.S. and Naidu, R. (2015). Rhizosphere-induced heavy metal (loid) transformation in relation to bioavailability and remediation. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 15(2), 524-548. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162015005000051
  40. Sirrenberg, A., Göbel, C., Grond, S., Czempinski, N., Ratzinger, A., Karlovsky, P. and Pawlowski, K. (2007). Piriformospora indica affects plant growth by auxin production. Physiologia Plantarum, 131(4), 581-589. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00973.x
  41. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
  42. Strehmel, N., Mönchgesang, S., Herklotz, S., Krüger, S., Ziegler, J. and Scheel, D. (2016). Piriformospora indica stimulates root metabolism of Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(7), 1091. doi: 10.3390/ijms17071091
  43. Taghipour, M. and Jalali, M. (2016). Influence of organic acids on kinetic release of chromium in soil contaminated with leather factory waste in the presence of some adsorbents. Chemosphere, 155, 395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.095
  44. Vimal, S.R., Singh, J.S., Arora, N.K. and Singh, S. (2017). Soil-plant-microbe interactions in stressed agriculture management: a review. Pedosphere, 27(2), 177-192. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60317-1
  45. Walkley, A. and Black, T.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29-38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  46. Youssef, R.A. and Chino, M. (1989). Root-induced changes in the rhizosphere of plants. II. Distribution of heavy metals across the rhizosphere in soils. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 35(4), 609-621. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1989.10434857
  47. Zibaei, Z., Ghasemi-Fasaei, R., Ronaghi, A., Zarei, M. and Zeinali, S. (2020). Improvement of biochar capability in Cr immobilization via modification with chitosan and hematite and inoculation with Pseudomonas putida. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51(7), 963-975. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2020.1738744.